requestId:684c3e3f906a25.95370105.
Xunzi’s “The King of Soul” answered to the book “Successful King”
Author: Yao Haifeng (Qingshima Urban College)
Source: Author Authorized by the Author Confucian Network Published
Originally published in “The Three Islands of Chongqing University” 2020 Issue 2
Excerpt: Since the Qing Dynasty, the book “The King of Soul” answered to the book “The King of Soul” is truly divided into two schools that are clear about in the Wei Dynasty: denying the school and confirming the school. This book is recorded in classics such as “Sun Qing Book”, “Xunzi”, “Korean Feizi”, “Korean Poetry Foreign Affairs”, “War Policy”, “Popularity”, “Age Postscript”, and “Long and Short Book”. By sorting out the different versions of the “King of Soul” answers, we can analyze the inheritance of increasing benefits between each other. From this we can infer that the answer to the answer is the content that is missing from the current version of Xunzi.
Keywords: Xunzi; “The King of Soul” answers; “The King of Soul”; “The King of Soul”; “The King of Soul” 年后公司”
Classification number: B222.6 Text code: A Article number: 1009- 8135 (2020) 02-0000-09
Fund Project: Key Course for Humanities and Social Sciences of Qingshima University “Understanding ‘score’ to make the group and ‘art’ benefit to life – Xunzi Political Philosophy Research” (QY18RA01).
Author introduction: Yao Haifeng (1981-), male, from Gaomi, Shandong, associate professor, important researcher, discussing the pre-Qin Confucian philosophy and Xunzi philosophy.
1. The reply to “The King of Soul” originated from the collection of academic history
The land of Lanling was originally the “sub-country” of Lu, but later it was occupied by the Chu Kingdom and became its territory. Its civilization is both long and profound. When talking about Lanling civilization, we have to mention Xunzi. Because Xunzi was the founder of Lanling civilization and the shaping of Lanling’s essence. Xunzi was the main political contribution of Lanling, and was also the foundation of Lanling civilization.
(I) The origin of the reply to “The King of Soul”
Xunzi went to Jixia School in Qiguo to study. After learning, he grew up in Jixia and became a Confucian master. “Historical Records” says: “In the eighth year of Chu, Chunshen Jun prime minister, he attacked Chu in northern China and appointed Xun Qing as the Lanling Order.” [1] Volume 78 “Chunshen Jun Lie” 2907 also says: “The people of Qi may have given Xun Qing, Xun Qing is suitable for Chu, but Chunshen Jun regards it as the Lanling Order. Chunshen Jun passed away and Xun Qing died, so he was buried in Lanling.” [1] Volume 74 “Chunshen Jun Mencius and Xun Qing” 2852 Xunzi was verbalized in Qi Country., in desperation, ran away from Chu and had an intersection with Chunshen Jun Huang Xie. Xunzi, a generation of scholars, captured the Lanling government from Chunshen Jun’s eyes that were eager for talents. Huang Xie allowed him to have a Lanling Order, and Xunzi asked him to have a political harmony.
The ups and downs of Xunzi’s reign as a Lanling Lingling are available from “Korean Poems External Translation·Volume 4” and “Warring States Strategy·Chu Ce4·Kids’s Journey to Chunshen Jun” Chunshen Jun once tactfully thanked Xunzi for his words from the guest. Therefore, Xunzi traveled far away to Zhaoguo and was appointed as the “Shangqing”. At that time, another guest of Chunshen Jun spoke, saying, “Now, Shu Zi is a nationwide recruit, why should you conquer him!” [2] Volume 17 “Chu Ce 4” 470 So, Chunshen Jun sent an envoy to Zhaoguo to invite Xunzi. Due to his previous low-key experience, Xunzi asked the envoy to bring back a reply. This is the reply to “The King of Soul”. Later, Xunzi Neng was moved by Chunshen Jun’s sincerity and finally took office as the Lanling Order.
(II) The academic history gathering that “The King of Soul” really induced by the book “The King of Soul”
“The King of Soul” did not publish the book “The King of Soul”. Liu Xiang’s “Sun Qing Book Record” began to report the matter: “Chun Shen Jun sent someone to hire Sun Qing, and Sun Qing sent a man to the Chunshen Jun’s books to apologize Chu, because he sang and paid tribute, he gave him Chunshen Jun.” [3]539 “The Common Idioms of Style” was based on Liu Xiang’s “Sun Shen Jun, and said: “Chun Shen Jun asked Sun Shi, and asked Chunshen Jun’s books to apologize Chu, because he sang and paid tribute, so he gave him Chunshen Jun.” [4] Volume 7 “Ji Tong” 323 The annotation of “Xun Zi” by Yang Yu of Tang was important in saying “Xun Zi did not have annotations, and he also edited and simplified, and wrote misunderstandings” [3] “Preface to Xunzi” 43. Since his focus was on the annotation of the words and sentences of “Sun Qing Xin Book” seen at that time, rather than the examination of Xunzi’s affairs, he did not reply to the “Zheng Wang” to answer the matter.
The King of Soul” replied to the book without any disagreement. After the Qing Dynasty, with the increase in the number of people who commented on Xun, at that time, two schools that were clear about in the academic world: denying the school and confirming the school.
The denial faction was represented by the Qing Dynasty Wang Zhong. Wang Zhong believed: “Chunshen asked Xue Zi, and Xue Zi answered the book, and went or went, and once made a difference, which led to the previous generation of disasters and death. I don’t know what the meaning is.” [5] “The General Review of Xun Qingzi” 90, he believed that this letter was “I don’t know who is so empty, but Korean baby mistook “The Poems”. Liu Xiang did not observe it, so he adopted the “National Strategy”, and his “New Book of Xunzi” was published again, and this was lost.” [5] “The General Review of Xun Qingzi” 90. His suggestion is that this misunderstanding was caused by Korean babies and he rushed to Guang. The content of the book is “Han Feizi·Rich and Robbery Minister” and the last chapter of “Xunzi·Zheng” “The Book of the Ruins”Cultivate the Conditions.
Confirm the mission to clear peopleXie Yong and Hu Yuanjun are representatives. Xie Yong quoted the “Preface to Xunzi’s Prayer” to answer the things mentioned in the book to prove Xunzi’s character and his predecessors. “The National Policy only provides the Spring Expo, and aims to achieve success and achieve success. If he had seen it earlier in the tragedy of Liyuan, and was the word “the king of the king”, his philosophy was definitely different from what Zhu Ying had written for the 平台王生影在线VIP“[3]13 Xie’s high praise for the “Healthy King” answer, and he said that it had not appeared in the current versionBaocai website “Xunzi” is resentful-“This is particularly clear. Now this article is gone, but Xie Chunshen’s book is not published, and Yang’s notes are not included. These seem to have not been carefully reviewed yet.” [3]14 It can be seen that Xie’s answer to “The King of Soul” has always stood up for the position of trust.
Hu Yuanjun’s “Huang Qing’s Disclaimer” and “The Strategies of the War” compiled the content of the reply to “The King of Soul” into it, treating it as a major event in Xunzi’s life. In his “Twenty-two Events of Xunqing’s Different Examinations”, he also examined the guest and said that Chunshen Jun was a matter of Junshen, and even suspected that Zhu Ying was “a guest who opposed Xunqing and Zhao”. At the same time, Hu also criticized Wang Zhong, saying: “Wang is self-proclaimed by his examination and is arrogant for a while, but he did not expect that he would also leave this Wushu saying to the world.” [3]42 The predecessors were usually more elegant and often “read the strings and songs to know the meaning of elegance.” It may not be as Wang Zhong said, “answer” is clearly the word “answer or those who go”.
In modern times, the situation that has not yet changed in the “Healthy King” answers to the book “The Unforgettable” has not yet changed. There are those who deny it. For example, Mo Mu believed that Xunzi was the ruling of Lanling, but he did not agree with the reply to “The King of Soul”. The important reason is that it does not believe in the sacred direction. Some scholars also believe that Xunzi’s affairs as the Ren Lanling Order of Chu were true, and the answers to the “Heavenly King” which was seriously related to Ren Lanling Order was false[6]3.
There are those who are sure. Liang Qixiong’s “Xunzi
